Anonymous

Site News
Warning: This wiki contains spoilers. Read at your own risk!

Social media: If you would like, please join our Discord server, and/or follow us on X (Twitter) or Tumblr!

Fire Emblem Wiki:Featured Articles: Difference between revisions

From Fire Emblem Wiki, your source on Fire Emblem information. By fans, for fans.
no edit summary
No edit summary
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
 
(5 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 17: Line 17:
# A minimum of ''four (4)'' votes in support of the article are needed for a page to become featured.
# A minimum of ''four (4)'' votes in support of the article are needed for a page to become featured.
# You cannot vote in support for the article you have nominated.
# You cannot vote in support for the article you have nominated.
# All votes should be placed properly under the support or oppose sections, with your vote starting off with <nowiki>#</nowiki>, and explaination on why you think this is a page worthy of being featured, and finally ending with your signature (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>). For instance: "# I really like the Ike page. It has a lot of information about the character! <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>." Any vote without a proper signature will be removed. As well, any vote that merely says: "I approve" "I like this page" or anything similar will be removed too. A perfect example of a vote would be: "I think this page has a lot of helpful information and it is clear enough to assist me on knowing about [[cavalier]]s."
# All votes should be placed properly under the support or oppose sections, with your vote starting off with <nowiki>#</nowiki>, and explanation on why you think this is a page worthy of being featured, and finally ending with your signature (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>). For instance: "# I really like the Ike page. It has a lot of information about the character! <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>." Any vote without a proper signature will be removed. As well, any vote that merely says: "I approve" "I like this page" or anything similar will be removed too. A perfect example of a vote would be: "I think this page has a lot of helpful information and it is clear enough to assist me on knowing about [[cavalier]]s."


<span style="font-size:18px;">Opposition Guidelines</span>
<span style="font-size:18px;">Opposition Guidelines</span>
Line 27: Line 27:


== Current Nominations ==
== Current Nominations ==
[[File:FESK Arvis 03.png|right|100px]]
===[[Arvis]]===
Arvis's article is well-written, has a comprehensive biography, features complete stats for all of his appearances (including ''Awakening'' growth rates), a detailed personality section, and plenty of citations; the article is essentially complete with no major improvements needed. Therefore, I believe it deserves to be a featured article. [[User:Eyacorkett|Eyacorkett]] ([[User talk:Eyacorkett|talk]]) 11:50, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
{{support}}
{{oppose}}
{{NeutralOther}}
{{retracted}}


===Remove the featured article system===
===Remove the featured article system===
Line 35: Line 46:


{{oppose}}
{{oppose}}
*No votes.
:I disagree. The feature article system has a lot of potential to provide knowledge to others and can help welcome more people into the series, by providing quick and easy information about game entries. [[User:Armatts|Armatts]] ([[User talk:Armatts|talk]]) 09:25, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
 
not true this system can show how hard the community has worked
{{NeutralOther}}
{{NeutralOther}}
:I know there's a link to this page under the featured articles, but I wonder if there's a better way to increase the visibility of nominations (and, indeed, the proposal of removing them considering the lack of response, I was only reminded of this through Discord) instead of nuking them. The link does just say to nominate one, not that there are any ongoing. The more "social" aspects of this wiki aren't very active in general.  I'm not particularly attached to featured articles or anything, either, though. [[User:L95|L95]] ([[User talk:L95|talk]]) 21:27, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
:I know there's a link to this page under the featured articles, but I wonder if there's a better way to increase the visibility of nominations (and, indeed, the proposal of removing them considering the lack of response, I was only reminded of this through Discord) instead of nuking them. The link does just say to nominate one, not that there are any ongoing. The more "social" aspects of this wiki aren't very active in general.  I'm not particularly attached to featured articles or anything, either, though. [[User:L95|L95]] ([[User talk:L95|talk]]) 21:27, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
Line 64: Line 75:


{{support}}
{{support}}
*No votes.
:I think Awakening would be a fine candidate for a featured article. With the game itself introducing many people to the series and renewing interest in the series and with its tenth anniversary of its release in Japan coming up, I see this as a perfect nomination for a featured article. [[User:Armatts|Armatts]] ([[User talk:Armatts|talk]]) 09:49, 24 January 2021 (UTC)


{{oppose}}
{{oppose}}
Line 74: Line 85:
{{retracted}}
{{retracted}}
*No votes.
*No votes.
== tiki ==
as one of the most important fire emblem characters, she should definitely get a page 


== Featured Articles ==
== Featured Articles ==
7,997

edits