4,503
edits
| Site News |
|---|
| Warning: This wiki contains spoilers. Read at your own risk! Social media: If you would like, please join our Discord server, and/or follow us on X (Twitter) or Tumblr! |
Fire Emblem Wiki:Featured Articles: Difference between revisions
From Fire Emblem Wiki, your source on Fire Emblem information. By fans, for fans.
Fire Emblem Wiki:Featured Articles (view source)
Revision as of 20:27, 11 January 2018
, 11 January 2018no edit summary
Anferensis (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
|||
| Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
# Heroes clearly doesn't care about spoilers. [[User:Lukey140701|Luke]] ([[User talk:Lukey140701|talk]]) 17:02, 11 January 2018 (UTC) | # Heroes clearly doesn't care about spoilers. [[User:Lukey140701|Luke]] ([[User talk:Lukey140701|talk]]) 17:02, 11 January 2018 (UTC) | ||
# I initially agreed with Lukey's comment in the Neutral section, however with the release of Zelgius in Heroes they've made no attempt to even hide his identity as the Black kKnight at all and it's becoming more and more futile to attempt to hide spoilers. They didn't even have him in his red armor... So, support. [[User:L95|L95]] ([[User talk:L95|talk]]) 17:59, 11 January 2018 (UTC) | # I initially agreed with Lukey's comment in the Neutral section, however with the release of Zelgius in Heroes they've made no attempt to even hide his identity as the Black kKnight at all and it's becoming more and more futile to attempt to hide spoilers. They didn't even have him in his red armor... So, support. [[User:L95|L95]] ([[User talk:L95|talk]]) 17:59, 11 January 2018 (UTC) | ||
# Given that the purpose of a Featured Article is to display the best articles on the site – not necessarily to "showcase something new" – and that Nintendo has made no attempt to disguise Zelgius's identity in the latest Heroes update, I support this Featured Article nomination. [[User:Anferensis|Anferensis]] ([[User talk:Anferensis|talk]]) 20:27, 11 January 2018 (UTC) | |||
===={{Oppose}}==== | ===={{Oppose}}==== | ||
| Line 45: | Line 46: | ||
===={{NeutralOther}}==== | ===={{NeutralOther}}==== | ||
# While I agree that the article is very thorough and well-written, I also understand that it contains numerous spoilers that may deem it unsuitable to be a featured article. I would be willing to support this nomination if someone can address the concerns of the opposition. [[User:Anferensis|Anferensis]] ([[User talk:Anferensis|talk]]) 06:09, 20 October 2017 (UTC) | # <s>While I agree that the article is very thorough and well-written, I also understand that it contains numerous spoilers that may deem it unsuitable to be a featured article. I would be willing to support this nomination if someone can address the concerns of the opposition. [[User:Anferensis|Anferensis]] ([[User talk:Anferensis|talk]]) 06:09, 20 October 2017 (UTC)</s> | ||
# <s>I'm okay with this becoming a featured article so long as Black Knight is not mentioned in the blurb used on the homepage, and also that it's made clear that this page in particular is spoiler-filled, possibly by adding a message above or below the blurb. The global spoiler notice may be missed and this is a major spoiler from my understanding and I wouldn't want it to be spoiled just by following a link on the home page. That is my only issue as the article itself is pretty good, and if my suggestions are put into effect in one way or another, I support. [[User:Lukey140701|Luke]] ([[User talk:Lukey140701|talk]]) 22:02, 10 November 2017 (UTC)</s> | # <s>I'm okay with this becoming a featured article so long as Black Knight is not mentioned in the blurb used on the homepage, and also that it's made clear that this page in particular is spoiler-filled, possibly by adding a message above or below the blurb. The global spoiler notice may be missed and this is a major spoiler from my understanding and I wouldn't want it to be spoiled just by following a link on the home page. That is my only issue as the article itself is pretty good, and if my suggestions are put into effect in one way or another, I support. [[User:Lukey140701|Luke]] ([[User talk:Lukey140701|talk]]) 22:02, 10 November 2017 (UTC)</s> | ||
---- | ---- | ||
