28,015
edits
| Site News |
|---|
| Warning: This wiki contains spoilers. Read at your own risk! Social media: If you would like, please join our Discord server, and/or follow us on X (Twitter) or Tumblr! |
Fire Emblem Wiki:Featured Articles: Difference between revisions
From Fire Emblem Wiki, your source on Fire Emblem information. By fans, for fans.
Fire Emblem Wiki:Featured Articles (view source)
Revision as of 14:04, 11 January 2018
, 11 January 2018→{{NeutralOther}}
| Line 45: | Line 45: | ||
# While I agree that the article is very thorough and well-written, I also understand that it contains numerous spoilers that may deem it unsuitable to be a featured article. I would be willing to support this nomination if someone can address the concerns of the opposition. [[User:Anferensis|Anferensis]] ([[User talk:Anferensis|talk]]) 06:09, 20 October 2017 (UTC) | # While I agree that the article is very thorough and well-written, I also understand that it contains numerous spoilers that may deem it unsuitable to be a featured article. I would be willing to support this nomination if someone can address the concerns of the opposition. [[User:Anferensis|Anferensis]] ([[User talk:Anferensis|talk]]) 06:09, 20 October 2017 (UTC) | ||
# I'm okay with this becoming a featured article so long as Black Knight is not mentioned in the blurb used on the homepage, and also that it's made clear that this page in particular is spoiler-filled, possibly by adding a message above or below the blurb. The global spoiler notice may be missed and this is a major spoiler from my understanding and I wouldn't want it to be spoiled just by following a link on the home page. That is my only issue as the article itself is pretty good, and if my suggestions are put into effect in one way or another, I support. [[User:Lukey140701|Luke]] ([[User talk:Lukey140701|talk]]) 22:02, 10 November 2017 (UTC) | # I'm okay with this becoming a featured article so long as Black Knight is not mentioned in the blurb used on the homepage, and also that it's made clear that this page in particular is spoiler-filled, possibly by adding a message above or below the blurb. The global spoiler notice may be missed and this is a major spoiler from my understanding and I wouldn't want it to be spoiled just by following a link on the home page. That is my only issue as the article itself is pretty good, and if my suggestions are put into effect in one way or another, I support. [[User:Lukey140701|Luke]] ([[User talk:Lukey140701|talk]]) 22:02, 10 November 2017 (UTC) | ||
---- | |||
# I think it's fair to say that the latest ''Heroes'' update has killed the single opposition argument here stone dead. Unless there are any other arguments to be made against featuring this article, I will go ahead and close the vote and feature the article. I'll allow one more week in case anyone wants to make any more arguments against it. --[[User:Moydow|<span style="color: green;">Moy</span><span style="color: orange;">dow</span>]] ([[User talk:Moydow|Support]]) 14:03, 11 January 2018 (UTC) | |||
===={{Retracted}}==== | ===={{Retracted}}==== | ||
