| Site News |
|---|
| Warning: This wiki contains spoilers. Read at your own risk! Social media: If you would like, please join our Discord server, and/or follow us on X (Twitter) or Tumblr! |
Talk:Chrom's father: Difference between revisions
From Fire Emblem Wiki, your source on Fire Emblem information. By fans, for fans.
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Not only that, but Chrom's father isn't even relevant to Gangrel's story, Gangrel's true motivation was to unite the continent to fight [[Valm]] and than to make the whole world suffer because he suffered in the slums of Plegia. The only real character in the story, the previous Ylisse affected was [[Emmeryn]]. [[User:Emperor Hardin|Emperor Hardin]] ([[User talk:Emperor Hardin|talk]]) 01:01, 25 November 2023 (UTC) | Not only that, but Chrom's father isn't even relevant to Gangrel's story, Gangrel's true motivation was to unite the continent to fight [[Valm]] and than to make the whole world suffer because he suffered in the slums of Plegia. The only real character in the story, the previous Ylisse affected was [[Emmeryn]]. [[User:Emperor Hardin|Emperor Hardin]] ([[User talk:Emperor Hardin|talk]]) 01:01, 25 November 2023 (UTC) | ||
:Even if some additional material somewhere says Gangrel was lying about his motivations, Chrom's Father is still relevant to his story, as it's what he cites as the justification for his war. This being authentic or not, from the view of an encyclopedia, is not relevant as even if a character is lying, the fact that they said it is the important thing. In fact, if there's evidence he is lying that means there is more content for the article, not less. [[User:Jotari|Jotari]] ([[User talk:Jotari|talk]]) 12:27, 25 November 2023 (UTC) | :Even if some additional material somewhere says Gangrel was lying about his motivations, Chrom's Father is still relevant to his story, as it's what he cites as the justification for his war. This being authentic or not, from the view of an encyclopedia, is not relevant as even if a character is lying, the fact that they said it is the important thing. In fact, if there's evidence he is lying that means there is more content for the article, not less. [[User:Jotari|Jotari]] ([[User talk:Jotari|talk]]) 12:27, 25 November 2023 (UTC) | ||
:: [[Gangrel]] gives his motivations [https://youtu.be/_k_BZYVHvZ8?t=27m24s here] and in [[Gangrel/Supports#C_Support|his supports]], all make it clear that the crusade never affected him at all. Similarly the other [[Plegia]]n characters like [[Henry]], [[Tharja]] and [[Aversa]] all have tragic backstories that do ''not'' involve Emmeryn's father's crusade in any way. Not even Validar, the leader of the [[Grimleal]] religion, Emmeryn's dad was trying to exterminate, mentions the crusade. | |||
::All things considered Emmeryn's dad is ''not'' relevant to the story as his crusade against the Grimleal didn't affect anyone in the story and Gangrel not caring about the crusade is relevant to Gangrel's page, not a page on Emmeryn's dad. [[User:Emperor Hardin|Emperor Hardin]] ([[User talk:Emperor Hardin|talk]]) 19:22, 25 November 2023 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 19:22, 25 November 2023
I oppose keeping this article as there is really nothing on Chrom's father. He has no name and no characterization, Chrom's father is a terrible name for an article and "Chrom's father" isn't even what the game calls him. Everything we know about him is summarized in The Exalt and the King.
Not only that, but Chrom's father isn't even relevant to Gangrel's story, Gangrel's true motivation was to unite the continent to fight Valm and than to make the whole world suffer because he suffered in the slums of Plegia. The only real character in the story, the previous Ylisse affected was Emmeryn. Emperor Hardin (talk) 01:01, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
- Even if some additional material somewhere says Gangrel was lying about his motivations, Chrom's Father is still relevant to his story, as it's what he cites as the justification for his war. This being authentic or not, from the view of an encyclopedia, is not relevant as even if a character is lying, the fact that they said it is the important thing. In fact, if there's evidence he is lying that means there is more content for the article, not less. Jotari (talk) 12:27, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
- Gangrel gives his motivations here and in his supports, all make it clear that the crusade never affected him at all. Similarly the other Plegian characters like Henry, Tharja and Aversa all have tragic backstories that do not involve Emmeryn's father's crusade in any way. Not even Validar, the leader of the Grimleal religion, Emmeryn's dad was trying to exterminate, mentions the crusade.
- All things considered Emmeryn's dad is not relevant to the story as his crusade against the Grimleal didn't affect anyone in the story and Gangrel not caring about the crusade is relevant to Gangrel's page, not a page on Emmeryn's dad. Emperor Hardin (talk) 19:22, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
