Site News
Warning: This wiki contains spoilers. Read at your own risk!

Social media: If you would like, please join our Discord server, and/or follow us on Twitter (X) or Tumblr!

Cross-Wiki Week 2023: From September 23 to October 1, make contributions to NIWA wikis and participating affiliates that you normally don't edit for a chance to win a Nintendo eShop gift card! See here for more details.

Talk:Chrom

From Fire Emblem Wiki, your source on Fire Emblem information. By fans, for fans.

What to do about the small portraits?

As recently as two days ago, File:Small portrait chrom fe13.png was a portrait properly facing from left to right, with File:Small portrait chrom l fe13.png being its right-to-left counterpart (invoked mainly on support pages [example] so that the characters had portraits facing each other--they've now apparently been made to face away from each other [the template's been programmed to assume default small portraits go left-to-right, with the right-hand portrait having flip code applied to it when not invoking Chrom so that the portraits would face each other], but apart from Chrom and Robn, that's a separate issue), between them both properly displaying the two different poses Chrom uses when facing those directions. All of a sudden, the former image got replaced with an image of the left-to-right portrait facing the wrong direction; this prompted the insertion of Template:BadImage in hopes of getting the image flipped back so it correctly went left-to-right, only for it to be apparently responded to by having a duplicate of the latter image uploaded onto the former image, which means we now currently don't even have the small portrait version of the left-to-right pose and instead have two versions of the small portrait version of the right-to-left pose. What should we do about this conundrum? We need to have both small portraits in their correct poses facing the correct directions, but some questionable decision mean we currently do not...--Shiningpikablu252 (talk) 03:23, 7 July 2018 (UTC)

Added Elice as a relative

I added Elice as a relative using the term 'indirect ancestor'. I used this term based in term 'indirect descendant' but if anyone thinks their is a more accurate term feel free to change it. I realize that they are very, very distantly related and that adding her is a bit nitpicky, but if it helps make these character pages a little more extensive, it couldn't hurt to add it :P. Though maybe their relation is too extended to worth mentioning. Moulder (talk) 10:26, 8 December 2018 (UTC)Moulder