Site News
Warning: This wiki contains spoilers. Read at your own risk!

Social media: If you would like, please join our Discord server, and/or follow us on Twitter (X) or Tumblr!

Talk:List of Acts in Fire Emblem Gaiden: Difference between revisions

From Fire Emblem Wiki, your source on Fire Emblem information. By fans, for fans.
 
Line 2: Line 2:


Looking through the pages on the battles and locations, there's some inconsistency that I'm going to work out. Units joining in exploration sections will be noted in exploration sections. Additionally, "(needed to progress)" in unit recruitment is unnecessary, occasionally incorrect, and unused elsewhere throughout the site, so that will be cut. Any locations will be given their own articles if they don't already have them, and some information on the ones that do already exist will either be expunged entirely or moved to a strategy section. The articles for exploration sections as a whole should probably receive a more thorough restructuring. Someone let me know if ought not make any of these changes. [[User:Thecornerman|Thecornerman]] ([[User talk:Thecornerman|talk]]) 19:53, 12 October 2018 (UTC)
Looking through the pages on the battles and locations, there's some inconsistency that I'm going to work out. Units joining in exploration sections will be noted in exploration sections. Additionally, "(needed to progress)" in unit recruitment is unnecessary, occasionally incorrect, and unused elsewhere throughout the site, so that will be cut. Any locations will be given their own articles if they don't already have them, and some information on the ones that do already exist will either be expunged entirely or moved to a strategy section. The articles for exploration sections as a whole should probably receive a more thorough restructuring. Someone let me know if ought not make any of these changes. [[User:Thecornerman|Thecornerman]] ([[User talk:Thecornerman|talk]]) 19:53, 12 October 2018 (UTC)
:I disagree about the required to progress thing, as that is kind of a unique aspect of the way ''Gaiden'' characters are recruited, with them being entities on a freely traversible map ("map" here referring to towns, caves, and dungeons) that can stand in the way of your progress, and this is why I think it should be kept. As for page creation for locations, I think only major ones (such as the Temple of Mila) should have articles, because stuff like "Sea 1", "Western Zofia", "Novis Graveyard", etc. have nothing worth saying anything about. [[User:PikaSamus|PikaSamus]] ([[User talk:PikaSamus|talk]]) 20:05, 12 October 2018 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:05, 12 October 2018

Formatting for the Exploration and Battle Articles

Looking through the pages on the battles and locations, there's some inconsistency that I'm going to work out. Units joining in exploration sections will be noted in exploration sections. Additionally, "(needed to progress)" in unit recruitment is unnecessary, occasionally incorrect, and unused elsewhere throughout the site, so that will be cut. Any locations will be given their own articles if they don't already have them, and some information on the ones that do already exist will either be expunged entirely or moved to a strategy section. The articles for exploration sections as a whole should probably receive a more thorough restructuring. Someone let me know if ought not make any of these changes. Thecornerman (talk) 19:53, 12 October 2018 (UTC)

I disagree about the required to progress thing, as that is kind of a unique aspect of the way Gaiden characters are recruited, with them being entities on a freely traversible map ("map" here referring to towns, caves, and dungeons) that can stand in the way of your progress, and this is why I think it should be kept. As for page creation for locations, I think only major ones (such as the Temple of Mila) should have articles, because stuff like "Sea 1", "Western Zofia", "Novis Graveyard", etc. have nothing worth saying anything about. PikaSamus (talk) 20:05, 12 October 2018 (UTC)